From UGT, with the brochure, we have not done anything to help each and every one of the dock to go to the polls with the data in hand. We have simply taken a look at the last 4 years, both state and local level, listing the facts and giving our opinion, making clear which also has been our work during that period and what are our goals for the future. Since then we have not stopped to think if someone was going to be hurt or become the victim, because we understand that we all act in conscience and the collective good, so less theater and more union work.
Those who like to boast both majorities, will also assume the consequences of decisions made under them instead of blaming those who later branded as insignificant.
And by the way, for your information, the triptych is made by several members of UGT Bilboestiba, they do not need anyone to come to write what they have experienced personally in the past year and a half.
And yes, we confirm in writing on it when we say that the Privatization, the Port Law, the failed IV Framework Agreement and the lack of firmness against the continuous attacks of the company are killing us slowly, but not so slowly to realize not every day. To deny that is denying the evidence and it is reckless and negligent. Or open your eyes now, or when we do will be too late, with a disjointed group, tired, resigned and subdued.
talk about them and us as it does again Coordinator weakens us. A works council active, involved and to defend all workers strengthens us. Decisions unilaterally weaken us, make us stronger in General Assembly. Conspiracy after reaching compromises shameful destroys us. The transparent, contrasting opinions and submission to the opinion of employees makes us invincible.
is curious that we return to port to the conflict to us, UGT, and suppose that the ELA and LAB and some members of Coordinadora. Ultimately all that at a given moment we stepped forward to defend our rights to assume the consequences with dignity.
Do we who put the dismissals on the table, we asked insistently an ERE, we demanded the money if they did not do a certain number of days or we were delayed in the payment of payroll as leverage?
NO. The conflict created what some companies. We just chose our side, the side of the dock, while others either sided with the company or acted with surprising warmth.
Of course, we do not need parentheses to clarify what is our home. I
worth anything to justify your actions. Comes so cheap you lie to your members and the other workers that have become commonplace not we import the consequences.
So we have to expose your lies
In the port of Pasajes, despite having majority UGT, discussed and decided at the General Assembly for all workers signing the ERE (accepted with only one dissenting vote) as stated the news bulletin published by the COORDINATOR (Open news). A redundancy that guarantees full pay and without having to put a single euro workers. This shows that we are serious problems affecting all Longshoremen at the port and therefore the proposals are decided as a whole General Assembly.
What you TRANSFENICA complains of is that you have not received all the workers to the unilateral change of working conditions. You have not counted or with your membership. No one disputes that do not want these ships, but if doing so in a fair, clear and not capricious, incomprehensible and deregulation, in exchange for favors.
in any paragraph of the brochure say that Bilbao has been the only port "with a rise greater than the IPC" and above you accuse us of wanting to blow it at the General Assembly. A demonstration of your lies and tyranny. In the General Assembly that the workers asked us most was that we included 2011 in the extension of the agreement. But you were going to take notice. That it shows is that you sweat it Democratically decide what the General Assembly. Remember that because of that Assembly were going to resign and did not do it all either.
your democracy to accept what is decided in your internal assemblies is at least also very curious. "Make as many assemblies as necessary until you leave what you propose." The horizontal transport
the facts speak for themselves and each other's work is documented. We take it seriously while others do not take the initiative and let others do it. They seem bothered that a solution could be reached. Let no one doubt that if Coordinator had worked half of what it has done UGT the subject and would be solved, of course instead be devoted to putting stones on the road and cynical use scatological phrases to accuse others of cynicism. And when we tell others we refer to all the parties involved have been those that have asked for the postponement of the trial, including COORDINATOR.
As you have been afraid, but what you ... What have you done to recover the Horizontal Transport? Where is your complaint?
Ours is decided on 8 September, if not reach an agreement satisfactory to all.
Finally we remind workers that the vote is secret and free. For the world press and let you vote in conscience. Remember to choose those who will have to defend and look out for your interests during the next four years.
Fool me once, yours is the guilt.
Fool me two, the fault is mine. (Anaxagoras)
I would like to add that I think it has served well to have a works council fully manipulated by a majority that has done absolutely nothing and remained immobile at many situaciones.Con I mean that maybe we should consider more seriously compose a works council to defend the workers and to bid for performing general meetings on sensitive issues and where all can freely decide, among other things.
I do not argue, and I say personally, that coordinator has had successes but it is also true that in moments of great tension in the port has failed to take important decision for the collective good and that should change and stop to analyze how we can change and now is the time to cambios.Dando OPPORTUNITY people with concerns and desire to do things.
amazes me when I talk about these issues with colleagues from the ease with which you are so unimportant to change when I think it's necesario.Que majority group is not to say that things are doing well but always hide behind some friends the same ...
THESE EVIL IN THE PORT '?
YOU THINK YOU WANT SOME?
SHOULD GIVE THANKS ...
These arguments and many other people seem little inteligentes.Desde then I'm not bad in the harbor ..... certainly not bad ... and of course I win I give thanks for having tengo.Eso work that no one disputes and not me I had to get me life Curren (unlike others). What is important to see is the work and dedication to make some things work and take stock. Because I think it's foolish to deny the evidence to see that we past hard times and many workers have had to mobilize because we thought that what he was doing was not good for us or for other colleagues who do not VEN.Defino see: think only of how well they won and how well está.Porque not forget that in the port there are workers who simply come to work and concern for van.Su everything else is zero patatero.Eso we all know and these are the most painful and that votes are delivered entregar.Luego workers there knowing that things have been done by coleguismo deny fatal and simpatia.Los there are fanatics who do not bother to look or handouts from other unions because they are fanatics with little coco.A those we leave a part because I never see more beyond their narices.No have concerns and are easily manipulated and it all personalidad.Yo creen.Allá and read them and I find out about almost everything and I have concerns and looking for change. what's wrong?
's get a committee to bet on the hustle and he's now escuche.El manipulated and does not listen and does what he wants only one union.
is my opinion.Sin more.
0 comments:
Post a Comment